Author Details:-
MALU B S
BBA LLB 2ND YEAR
ISBR LAW COLLEGE
INTRODUCTION
One’s equality, dignity, and general well-being are all negatively impacted by sexual harassment at work, which is a major issue. In response to this issue, legislation has been implemented to safeguard individuals against harassment and discrimination based on their gender. These legal measures seek to establish inclusive, courteous, and safe work environments where workers can perform their duties without worrying about being abused. These safeguards contribute to the creation of equitable and encouraging work environments for all employees by providing explicit guidelines and channels for reporting and resolving complaints. To guarantee a secure and courteous work environment for women, the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013[1] is a crucial piece of legislation in India. It stipulates that sexual harassment in the workplace must be actively prevented and offers a formalized process for handling and resolving complaints. The Act places a strong emphasis on the need to establish a safe environment where women can work without worrying about discrimination or exploitation.
LEGAL PROVISION
The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 is the principal legislation in India that governs protection against sexual harassment in the workplace. This law requires the creation of an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) in businesses with more than ten employees (Section 4) and forbids any kind of sexual harassment against women at work (Section 3). It specifies the ICC’s duty to carry out investigations and suggest disciplinary measures (Section 13) and permits resentful women to register complaints within three months (Section 9). Employers are required by Section 19 to establish a safe workplace. Furthermore, pertinent sections of the Indian Penal Code, such as Section 354A[2], identify and outline the penalties for sexual harassment. These rights are further upheld by Articles 14 and 21 of the Indian Constitution, which forbid discrimination based on gender, assures equality before the law, and protects the right to live in dignity. Up until the 2013 Act was passed, a framework for dealing with sexual harassment was also supplied by the Vishaka Guidelines, which were created by the Supreme Court in 1997.
JUDICIAL PRECEDENT
The Vishaka Guidelines were established by the Supreme Court of India in the landmark case Vishaka & Ors v. State of Rajasthan (1997)[3], which arose from the gang rape of social worker Bhanwari Devi, who advocated for women’s rights and against child marriage. Recognizing the absence of laws prohibiting sexual harassment in the workplace, the Supreme Court addressed the urgent need for a legal framework to protect women, acknowledging that such harassment violates their fundamental rights and hinders workforce participation. The guidelines defined sexual harassment, mandated employers to take proactive measures to prevent it, required the establishment of internal committees for addressing complaints, ensured protection against retaliation for complainants, encouraged awareness and training programs, and called for timely inquiries into complaints. Serving as a precursor to the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013, the Vishaka Guidelines laid the groundwork for legal protections and highlighted the necessity for comprehensive legislation, which was subsequently enacted to create formal mechanisms for preventing and addressing workplace harassment. Union of India v. Medha Kotwal Lele (2013)[4] In this judgment, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the importance of strictly adhering to the Vishaka Guidelines and stressed the duty of employers to provide a safe working environment. The significance of efficiently executing the rules was emphasized by the court. Principal Decisions The Court mandated that training sessions be held to inform staff members of their rights and obligations concerning sexual harassment. Impact of This decision increased accountability for employers in handling harassment accusations and emphasized their need to be proactive in handling them. The next case The Delhi High Court addressed the implementation of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act of 2013 in the case of Rukmini D. v. Union of India (2021)[5], emphasizing the vital significance of immediate investigations into allegations of sexual harassment. The Court stressed that allowing such cases to languish can deter victims from coming forward and compromise the fundamental intent of the law. This decision improved rights for women in the workplace and guaranteed a safer working environment by highlighting the need for effective complaint-handling procedures and reinforcing employer’s obligations to act swiftly.
CONCLUSION
Protecting against sexual harassment in the workplace is crucial for creating a respectful and inclusive environment where everyone can thrive. The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 was a significant milestone, providing clear legal protections for women and ensuring their right to work without fear of harassment. Building on the earlier Vishaka Guidelines, the law requires employers to take proactive steps, set up Internal Complaints Committees, and address complaints promptly. judicial decisions like Vishaka & Ors v. State of Rajasthan and Rukmini D. V. Union of India have reinforced these protections, emphasizing the need for accountability and swift action in handling harassment claims. Together, these laws and rulings help foster a workplace culture where individuals feel safe and valued. everyone both employers and employees needs to be aware of these protections and work together to uphold them. By doing so, we can ensure that our workplaces are not just safe, but also empowering spaces where everyone can contribute and succeed without fear of discrimination or harassment.
Leave a Reply