-
Continue reading →: Indra Sawhney v. Union of India
Author: Bridhima Sinha, 4th year, BBA LLB (Hons.) , University of Mumbai Law Academy Case Citation: Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India & Others, AIR 1993 SC 477 Introduction: The Indra Sawhney case is one of the most important landmark decisions in Indian constitutional law, dealing with reservations…
-
Continue reading →: Mohori Bibee vs Dharmodas Ghose [1903] UKPC 12, (1903) LR 30 IA 114
Article By: Pushkar Gulia Parties related to this case: Facts: In this case, Dharmodas Ghose was a young individual, who is 18 years old. He had some land under his authority but his mother was a legal in charge of that land. He, as a minor mortgaged his property to…
-
Continue reading →: Gender Equality vs. Religious Freedom: Analysing the Sabarimala Temple Judgement
AUTHOR : HASHIM AK, BBA LLB HONS STUDENT, GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE KOZHIKODE Abstract The Sabarimala Temple case, represents a pivotal moment in India’s legal and social history, encapsulating the tension between gender equality and religious freedom. Challenged as a violation of constitution the Supreme Court, which, in a landmark…
-
Continue reading →: Hoffman La Roche V. Cipla
MEENAKSHY V BBA LLB , 5TH YEAR KRISTU JAYANTI COLLEGE OF LAW Citation: 148 (2008) DLT 598 Judgment Delivered on :November 27, 2015 One of the most well-known incidents in India’s pharmaceutical sector is the patent dispute between Roche and Cipla over the cancer medication Erlotinib, which is sold as…
-
Continue reading →: Landmark judgement regarding the maintenance provision : “Mohammad Ahmed Khan v/s Shah bano Begum (1985)”.
Mohammed Ahmed Khan v/s Shah bano Begum 1985 AIR 945 1985 SCR (3) 844 1985 SCC(2) 556 1985 scale (1) 767 (1985) SCCR R294 ,1985 (87) BOM LR 435 Article By: Gaurashwari Rathod ABSTRACT India being a secular nation with various religion, traditions and practices stretches from The infinite ends…
-
Continue reading →: Shreya singhal v union of India: Freedom of Speech in the Digital Age
Author: Anushka, 1st Year, B.A.LLB, NMIMS Navi Mumbai Citation: AIR 2015 SC 1523 Petitioner: Shreya Singhal Respondent: Union of India Court: Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Bench: Justice J.Rohinton Fali Nariman, Justice J. Chelameswar. Background of the case The Shreya Singhal v. Union of India case is a historic ruling…
-
Continue reading →: Case Analysis: Harishchandra Hegde v. State of Karnataka (2004)
Authors name: Bridhima Sinha 4th Year, BBA. LLB (Hons.) , University of Mumbai Law Academy Citation: Harishchandra Hegde v. State of Karnataka, (2004) 9 SCC 780 Facts of the Case: The Government of Karnataka allotted a parcel of land, measuring two acres, to Smt. Gangamma on or about January 5,…
-
Continue reading →: Land Rights of Indigenous Communities in India: A Legal Examination of Landmark Cases
Article By: HASHIM AK, BBA LLB (Hons) Student, Government Law College Kozhikode Abstract The land rights of Indigenous communities in India are always a matter of discussion. This article examines the land rights of Indigenous communities in India through landmark judgments. This article dives into several landmark judgments related to…
-
Continue reading →: Citation- (2017) 10 SCC 1
Author: Shantanu Gupta, 1st Year, B.A.LLB of NMIMS Navi Mumbai Petitioner- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. Respondent- Union of India and Ors. Bench- Justice J.S. Khehar (CJl), J.Chelameswar, D.Y.Chandrachud, Rohinton Fali Nariman, R.K. Agarwal, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, S.A.Nazeer, S.A. Bobde, A.M. Sapre FACT OF THE CASE The Justice K.S.…
-
Continue reading →: Carlil V Carbolic Smoke Ball and co. (1893)
Article By: Bhanupriya Sharma Introduction: It is a landmark case law in english contract law that established the important principle regarding the formation of contracts.This case is renowned for its unique subject matter and significant legal implications Facts of the case Background Mrs., Lilli Carlilll bought the product, used it…